I got off of work early (930) last night which means I went to bed before 3AM (woot woot!) all this also means I was awake today before noon. I know that I should just accept this new schedule and that I'll be sleeping through the morning... but I really feel like a scumbag when I'm not up and functioning with the rest of the world, by at least 9AM. Anywho- back on topic, I was awake today at 9AM, cleaned up, chatted with the hubs then bathed (always a good thing). I think that was a good day. I was awake while other people I know were awake, then I got one of the movies on my
list, knocked off today with my homies,
Erin and
LB.
I loved it. I bet you there were a few scenes Rpatz wished he had his ol' vampire strength. But, after falling in love, training a Polish Elephant and getting his ass kicked all over New York State, Robert Pattinson really impressed me. My only negative about this movie was that I didn't really "buy" Rpatz and Reese Witherspoon.
Now that you know my opinion on this movie I have a question... What makes a "picture" a movie or a film? This is not a rhetorical question people... please tell me if there is actually a difference?!
Have you seen Water for Elephants? Did you like it?
3 comments:
Glad you had a good day! I havent seen water for elephants yet, glad you liked it! (in regards to your question, I dont know :)..)
Glad you had a good day :)
I havent seen the movie yet but have read the same thing you said, Rpatz & Reese didn't have the chemistry needed to pull off the movie.
And to answer your question, I looked it up & this is what Answers.com has to say about it:
"In the US, the terms are interchangeable, but most major, commercial motion pictures aimed at a broad viewing audience (in the hopes of making a profit) are usually referred to as "movies". The term "film" is commonly applied to movies of an artistic or educational nature not expected to have broad, commercial appeal."
I do not know. But I do know that it was a great movie!
Post a Comment